To be part of the Fediverse, those sofwares must have been conceived in order to allow the decentralisation.
So, #Threads is not in the Fediverse.

#BlueSky may become interoperable with the Fediverse and may be considered with gentleness but it will never become a part of the Fediverse.
@bsky.app @pfrazee.com @mike @dot_social @liaizon

So, alle Inhalte von #Bluesky #Threads, #X aka #Twitter entfernt und auf #Fediverse hier verwiesen.

Fühlt sich richtig gut an.

What if #ghost or #wordpress builds the perfect home for a writer/podcaster on the web, that also doubles as their social media dashboard? Could they kill #substack and #xitter? For that to happen, we'd probably also need #threads and #bluesky to fully federate by default. #SocialWeb

Last Week in the #ATmosphere:

- 20 million accounts on #Bluesky
- #Threads is taking the competition with Bluesky serious; Bluesky might be closer in size to Threads than thought
- experiments with visualising the firehose
- and a ton of links

Read at: https://fediversereport.com/last-week-in-the-atmosphere-2411-c/

The answer is: 1 (doesn’t count though because he’s a threads tech engineer).

The answer is: 1 (doesn’t count though because he’s a threads tech engineer).

An important distinction is slowly being uncovered about the definition of the term "fediverse." Who is it that gets to decide what this place is? How are we being represented? These are not easy questions to answer and if we don't do a better job describing ourselves, then the job will get done for us by people who don't understand the underlying values we hold. #fediverse #meta #threads

Alt...

An info graphic with two icons, one is the symbol for the fediverse that has risen from below and the other is made by Threads The "open fediverse" symbol The peoples representation of the fediverse The "Corporate Fediverse" symbol Threads* representation of the fediverse *Threads is a sub-brand of Meta as is Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp